Macagno, F., & Bigi, S. (2017). Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies, 19. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617691702
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2017). Communicative intentions and commitments. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (Vol. 14). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4_2
Macagno, F., & Bigi, S. (2020). Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication: Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation. Journal Of Argumentation In Context, 9. http://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18044.mac
Macagno, F. (2020). How can metaphors communicate arguments?. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17. http://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-3004
Macagno, F., & Rapanta, C. (2019). The dimensions of argumentative texts and their assessment. Studia Paedagogica, 24. http://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-4-1
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2018). Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach. Argumentation, 32. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5
Macagno, F. (2018). Assessing relevance. Lingua, 210-211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.007
Macagno, F., & Bigi, S. (2018). Types of Dialogue and Pragmatic Ambiguity. Argumentation Library (Vol. 32). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_9
Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians’ argumentative tweets—A coded dataset. Data In Brief, 44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108501
Macagno, F. (2022). Coding relevance. Learning, Culture And Social Interaction, 36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100349