Autor | |
Palavras-chave | |
Abstrato |
Robert Kimball, in "What s Wrong with Argumentum Ad Baculum?" (Argumentation, 2006) argues that dialogue-based models of rational argumentation do not satisfactorily account for what is objectionable about more malicious uses of threats encountered in some ad baculum arguments. We review the dialogue-based approach to argumentum ad baculum, and show how it can offer more than Kimball thinks for analyzing such threat arguments and ad baculum fallacies. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
|
Year of Publication |
2007
|
Journal |
Argumentation
|
Volume |
21
|
ISSN Number |
0920427X
|
DOI |
10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7
|