Primeiro nome
F.
Apelido
Macagno
Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2009). Reasoning from classifications and definitions. Argumentation, 23. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9110-2
View
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2008). The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory And Moral Practice, 11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9119-5
View
Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). The fallaciousness of threats: Character and Ad Baculum. Argumentation, 21. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7
View
Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Knowledge Engineering Review, 22. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888907001051
View
Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2006). Common knowledge in legal reasoning about evidence. International Commentary On Evidence, 3.
View
Rowe, G., Macagno, F., Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2006). Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy. Teaching Philosophy, 29. http://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200629217
View
Mayweg-Paus, E., Macagno, F., & Kuhn, D. (2016). Developing Argumentation Strategies in Electronic Dialogs: Is Modeling Effective?. Discourse Processes, 53. http://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1040323
View
Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2010). Defeasible classifications andinferences from definitions. Informal Logic, 30. http://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i1.692
View
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2015). Classifying the patterns of natural arguments. Philosophy And Rhetoric, 48. http://doi.org/10.1353/par.2015.0005
View
Macagno, F., & Bigi, S. (2017). Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies, 19. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617691702
View