Macagno, F. (2012). Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions. Argumentation, 26. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9232-9
Rapanta, C., & Macagno, F. (2019). Evaluation and promotion of argumentative reasoning among university students: The case of academic writing. Revista Lusofona De Educacao, 45. http://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle45.09
Martins, M., & Macagno, F. (2022). An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts. Science Education, 106. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21708
Macagno, F. (2018). Assessing relevance. Lingua, 210-211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.007
Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter. Journal Of Pragmatics, 191. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022
Macagno, F., & Bigi, S. (2018). Types of Dialogue and Pragmatic Ambiguity. Argumentation Library (Vol. 32). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_9
Macagno, F. (2022). Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy: Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments. Languages, 7. http://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010013
Rapanta, C., Miralda-Balda, A., Garcia-Milà, M., Vrikki, M., Macagno, F., & Evagorou, M. (2023). Detecting the factors affecting classroom dialogue quality. Linguistics And Education, 77. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101223
Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation Profiles: A Tool for Analyzing Argumentative Strategies. Informal Logic, 42. http://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i1.7215
Macagno, F. (2023). Questions as Dialogue Games. The Pragmatic Dimensions of “Authentic” Questions. Studies In Philosophy And Education, 42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09892-6